Honest comparison

How Beacon compares to
the alternatives you are weighing

Most MSPs decide between four options for Azure compliance: keep doing it by hand, stand up CIPP, lean on Microsoft Lighthouse, or run Beacon. Each has a real place. Here is a fair read on where each one fits.

Option 1

Manual and spreadsheets

Engineers pull posture from each tenant by hand and track it in spreadsheets or a shared doc.

Cost

Free tooling, high labour

Best when

You manage one or two tenants and reviews are rare.

Option 2

CIPP

A capable open-source MSP toolkit you host and operate yourself across client tenants.

Cost

Free software, you run it

Best when

You have the engineering time to deploy and maintain it.

Option 3

Microsoft Lighthouse

Microsoft's own multi-tenant view, included with eligible partner subscriptions.

Cost

Free with partner status

Best when

You want a baseline Microsoft 365 overview and little else.

Option 4

Beacon

A managed service that scans every tenant continuously and hands you report-ready findings.

Cost

From $49/mo, nothing to host

Best when

You want continuous coverage without running the tooling.

Where each option lands

Same questions, four honest answers. We score Beacon highly because it is built for this, not to put the others down.

Setup and ongoing effort

Manual

No setup, but every audit is hands-on work, every month.

CIPP

You deploy, secure, update, and operate the host yourself.

Lighthouse

Enabled through the partner portal with minimal setup.

Beacon

A read-only app registration per tenant, then it runs itself.

How often posture is checked

Manual

Whenever someone runs the review, often monthly.

CIPP

On demand or on whatever schedule you wire up and keep running.

Lighthouse

A near-live Microsoft view, mostly Microsoft 365 focused.

Beacon

Every tenant rechecked every 6 hours, with no babysitting.

Depth of Azure infrastructure coverage

Manual

As deep as the engineer who pulled it has time to go.

CIPP

Strong on Microsoft 365 tenant management, lighter on Azure resources.

Lighthouse

Centred on Microsoft 365 and endpoint health, not deep Azure posture.

Beacon

36 checks across identity, network, storage, Key Vault, and Defender.

Client-ready reporting

Manual

You format every report yourself from raw notes.

CIPP

Operational dashboards, not built for handing to a client.

Lighthouse

An internal partner view, not a per-client deliverable.

Beacon

Scheduled per-client reports with scores, trends, and remediation steps.

Who maintains it

Manual

Your team, every time, with no shared tooling to lean on.

CIPP

You own hosting, patching, and uptime for the toolkit.

Lighthouse

Microsoft runs it, but coverage is theirs to define.

Beacon

We run the platform and the scan engine, you just review findings.

When Beacon is not the answer

We would rather you pick the right tool than the wrong one with our name on it.

  • 01 If you manage a single tenant and already eyeball it in the portal, a paid tool is hard to justify. Try our $19 Solo plan or stay manual.
  • 02 If your need is broad Microsoft 365 tenant administration rather than Azure security posture, CIPP covers ground we do not aim at.
  • 03 If a free Microsoft 365 overview is all you want and Azure resource depth does not matter, Lighthouse is already in your partner portal.

When Beacon earns its keep

The pattern we hear most from MSP teams who switch to us.

  • You manage several client tenants and a monthly manual pass no longer keeps up.
  • You want continuous Azure posture without hosting and patching another tool.
  • You need reports you can hand to a client without an evening of formatting.
  • You want the same checks applied the same way across every tenant.

See the numbers for your own fleet

Run your tenant count through the ROI calculator, then start with a read-only demo. No credit card needed.